THE FINAL DESTINATION.

Nine years ago Jeffrey Reddick, Glen Morgan and James Wong (who all three contributed to writing tasks while Wong also handled direction) put their heads together to create a compelling tale of premonition, death, and ultimately the marriage of both. Reddick’s story centers around a French class, and the resident neurotic Alex (Devon Sawa) Browning who experiences an extremely vivid vision while boarding Flight 180, which is headed for Paris, France. Alex’s vision includes loose knobs, a shaky takeoff, and one hell of an explosion, which occurs just moments after beginning ascension. Naturally Alex is a bit freaked out by what seems to be life’s cruel case of foreshadowing, leading to an outburst on the plane which results in the evacuation of seven (including Alex) passengers.
Not five minutes pass and Flight 180 erupts in an explosion of fire and debris. Stunned, those who were forced from the plane turn their confusion and anger toward Alex, unaware of how he could possibly have known the disastrous fate of Flight 180. To Alex’s credit, he’s just as confused as everyone else, but neither his classmates, nor officials are apt to believe that Mr. Browning is some form of clairvoyant, or sudden psychic. But Alex has been cursed by some form of premonitory ability, and the tragedy that was Flight 180 was only the beginning. One by one, in a strange, but particular order - those who managed to escape death’s grasp on Flight 180 are being killed. With logic and the law both opposed to Alex and his claims, the teenager must solve a riddle proposed by Death Himself before his own card is finally pulled.
Three years later, Kimberly (A.J. Cook) Corman finds herself afflicted by the same psychic traits Alex battled three years prior, but she’s initially unaware of any connections whatsoever. Until that is, she sees a horrendous pileup on the freeway that claims handfuls of lives…just minutes before it actually happens. Kimberly’s expeditious panic saves quite a few lives, but she’ll soon discover that death cannot be swayed, and when it’s time to go, there is no saving lives. Before Ms. Corman can decipher the situation at hand however, she and those who escaped the accident all come to realize that they are in fact directly connected in some way or another to the Flight 180 victims. It is at this point that the group understands the severity of their predicament. But once again, Death has chosen it’s course, and though briefly swayed - He’s back on the trail of those who seek to sneak beyond the Reapers grip.
Fast-forward three more years and Death’s Design is once again in full effect. This time around, a group of teens who avoid a rollercoaster disaster thanks to Wendy (Mary Elizabeth Winstead) Christensen’s frighteningly accurate prediction of mechanical malfunction, are stalked and eliminated by life’s unseen nemesis. The clues are revealed in foreign fashion when compared to the pictures two predecessors, but the story is cohesive, despite a lack of sincere linking between these characters and the characters of the first two franchise installments. This time around Wendy and fellow survivor Kevin (Ryan Merriman) are forced to determine the means in which each victim will die, by discreet visual indicators located in pictures Wendy took the night of the accident. It’s a long journey to the end of the road, and Death has set out to see it‘s no comfortable trek. Whether or not anyone will survive this latest Design is a mystery… sort of.

THE VERDICT

Technically I think all three films are strong, well assembled pictures that clearly boast refined cinematography, sound direction, and precise, adequate script writing. James Wong did an impressive job directing the first and third franchise films, and David R. Ellis did more than hold his own while helming the first initial sequel. While each cast is built upon an overdose of teen friendly faces, the gore and sadistic nature of the violence is anything but teen friendly. The contrast makes for a unique vibe that few genre pieces manage to offer. The fact that that rare sensation has already been duplicated (with fair success) twice, only helps solidify FINAL DESTINATION’s place in horror history.
With the positive comes the negative, and like most (if not all) horror franchises, there’s only so far this story can go before it becomes little more than a special effects showcase, and launching pad for Hollywood’s fresh new faces. But really, does that mean we should discard all sequels beyond a direct follow up or two? No, I don’t personally think so. I believe franchise fans will always follow their favorites, whether it be the FINAL DESTINATIONs, or HALLOWEENs of the world isn’t relevant. What is, is the fact that we’ll always crave a new approach to an old tale, especially when that old tale holds a special place in our hearts.

THE FUTURE

In a matter of days THE FINAL DESTINATION, (the fourth film of the franchise, which will be featured in both 2-d and 3-d) will be unleashed in theatres and left to duke it out at the box office with Rob Zombie’s highly anticipated HALLOWEEN II. Who will emerge the financial superior remains to be seen, but fair earnings for both pictures could well lead to even more sequels. The best case scenario for genre fans is success for both pictures, whether future installments follow or not. Regardless of how many millions each respective flick draws, and what the future brings in direct relation to the embrace of each picture - in the end, it’s the fans who win when both films hit theaters this Friday!

THE FINAL DESTINATION.

Nine years ago Jeffrey Reddick, Glen Morgan and James Wong (who all three contributed to writing tasks while Wong also handled direction) put their heads together to create a compelling tale of premonition, death, and ultimately the marriage of both. Reddick’s story centers around a French class, and the resident neurotic Alex (Devon Sawa) Browning who experiences an extremely vivid vision while boarding Flight 180, which is headed for Paris, France. Alex’s vision includes loose knobs, a shaky takeoff, and one hell of an explosion, which occurs just moments after beginning ascension. Naturally Alex is a bit freaked out by what seems to be life’s cruel case of foreshadowing, leading to an outburst on the plane which results in the evacuation of seven (including Alex) passengers.
Not five minutes pass and Flight 180 erupts in an explosion of fire and debris. Stunned, those who were forced from the plane turn their confusion and anger toward Alex, unaware of how he could possibly have known the disastrous fate of Flight 180. To Alex’s credit, he’s just as confused as everyone else, but neither his classmates, nor officials are apt to believe that Mr. Browning is some form of clairvoyant, or sudden psychic. But Alex has been cursed by some form of premonitory ability, and the tragedy that was Flight 180 was only the beginning. One by one, in a strange, but particular order - those who managed to escape death’s grasp on Flight 180 are being killed. With logic and the law both opposed to Alex and his claims, the teenager must solve a riddle proposed by Death Himself before his own card is finally pulled.
Three years later, Kimberly (A.J. Cook) Corman finds herself afflicted by the same psychic traits Alex battled three years prior, but she’s initially unaware of any connections whatsoever. Until that is, she sees a horrendous pileup on the freeway that claims handfuls of lives…just minutes before it actually happens. Kimberly’s expeditious panic saves quite a few lives, but she’ll soon discover that death cannot be swayed, and when it’s time to go, there is no saving lives. Before Ms. Corman can decipher the situation at hand however, she and those who escaped the accident all come to realize that they are in fact directly connected in some way or another to the Flight 180 victims. It is at this point that the group understands the severity of their predicament. But once again, Death has chosen it’s course, and though briefly swayed - He’s back on the trail of those who seek to sneak beyond the Reapers grip.
Fast-forward three more years and Death’s Design is once again in full effect. This time around, a group of teens who avoid a rollercoaster disaster thanks to Wendy (Mary Elizabeth Winstead) Christensen’s frighteningly accurate prediction of mechanical malfunction, are stalked and eliminated by life’s unseen nemesis. The clues are revealed in foreign fashion when compared to the pictures two predecessors, but the story is cohesive, despite a lack of sincere linking between these characters and the characters of the first two franchise installments. This time around Wendy and fellow survivor Kevin (Ryan Merriman) are forced to determine the means in which each victim will die, by discreet visual indicators located in pictures Wendy took the night of the accident. It’s a long journey to the end of the road, and Death has set out to see it‘s no comfortable trek. Whether or not anyone will survive this latest Design is a mystery… sort of.

THE VERDICT

Technically I think all three films are strong, well assembled pictures that clearly boast refined cinematography, sound direction, and precise, adequate script writing. James Wong did an impressive job directing the first and third franchise films, and David R. Ellis did more than hold his own while helming the first initial sequel. While each cast is built upon an overdose of teen friendly faces, the gore and sadistic nature of the violence is anything but teen friendly. The contrast makes for a unique vibe that few genre pieces manage to offer. The fact that that rare sensation has already been duplicated (with fair success) twice, only helps solidify FINAL DESTINATION’s place in horror history.
With the positive comes the negative, and like most (if not all) horror franchises, there’s only so far this story can go before it becomes little more than a special effects showcase, and launching pad for Hollywood’s fresh new faces. But really, does that mean we should discard all sequels beyond a direct follow up or two? No, I don’t personally think so. I believe franchise fans will always follow their favorites, whether it be the FINAL DESTINATIONs, or HALLOWEENs of the world isn’t relevant. What is, is the fact that we’ll always crave a new approach to an old tale, especially when that old tale holds a special place in our hearts.

THE FUTURE

In a matter of days THE FINAL DESTINATION, (the fourth film of the franchise, which will be featured in both 2-d and 3-d) will be unleashed in theatres and left to duke it out at the box office with Rob Zombie’s highly anticipated HALLOWEEN II. Who will emerge the financial superior remains to be seen, but fair earnings for both pictures could well lead to even more sequels. The best case scenario for genre fans is success for both pictures, whether future installments follow or not. Regardless of how many millions each respective flick draws, and what the future brings in direct relation to the embrace of each picture - in the end, it’s the fans who win when both films hit theaters this Friday!

THE FINAL DESTINATION.

Nine years ago Jeffrey Reddick, Glen Morgan and James Wong (who all three contributed to writing tasks while Wong also handled direction) put their heads together to create a compelling tale of premonition, death, and ultimately the marriage of both. Reddick’s story centers around a French class, and the resident neurotic Alex (Devon Sawa) Browning who experiences an extremely vivid vision while boarding Flight 180, which is headed for Paris, France. Alex’s vision includes loose knobs, a shaky takeoff, and one hell of an explosion, which occurs just moments after beginning ascension. Naturally Alex is a bit freaked out by what seems to be life’s cruel case of foreshadowing, leading to an outburst on the plane which results in the evacuation of seven (including Alex) passengers.
Not five minutes pass and Flight 180 erupts in an explosion of fire and debris. Stunned, those who were forced from the plane turn their confusion and anger toward Alex, unaware of how he could possibly have known the disastrous fate of Flight 180. To Alex’s credit, he’s just as confused as everyone else, but neither his classmates, nor officials are apt to believe that Mr. Browning is some form of clairvoyant, or sudden psychic. But Alex has been cursed by some form of premonitory ability, and the tragedy that was Flight 180 was only the beginning. One by one, in a strange, but particular order - those who managed to escape death’s grasp on Flight 180 are being killed. With logic and the law both opposed to Alex and his claims, the teenager must solve a riddle proposed by Death Himself before his own card is finally pulled.
Three years later, Kimberly (A.J. Cook) Corman finds herself afflicted by the same psychic traits Alex battled three years prior, but she’s initially unaware of any connections whatsoever. Until that is, she sees a horrendous pileup on the freeway that claims handfuls of lives…just minutes before it actually happens. Kimberly’s expeditious panic saves quite a few lives, but she’ll soon discover that death cannot be swayed, and when it’s time to go, there is no saving lives. Before Ms. Corman can decipher the situation at hand however, she and those who escaped the accident all come to realize that they are in fact directly connected in some way or another to the Flight 180 victims. It is at this point that the group understands the severity of their predicament. But once again, Death has chosen it’s course, and though briefly swayed - He’s back on the trail of those who seek to sneak beyond the Reapers grip.
Fast-forward three more years and Death’s Design is once again in full effect. This time around, a group of teens who avoid a rollercoaster disaster thanks to Wendy (Mary Elizabeth Winstead) Christensen’s frighteningly accurate prediction of mechanical malfunction, are stalked and eliminated by life’s unseen nemesis. The clues are revealed in foreign fashion when compared to the pictures two predecessors, but the story is cohesive, despite a lack of sincere linking between these characters and the characters of the first two franchise installments. This time around Wendy and fellow survivor Kevin (Ryan Merriman) are forced to determine the means in which each victim will die, by discreet visual indicators located in pictures Wendy took the night of the accident. It’s a long journey to the end of the road, and Death has set out to see it‘s no comfortable trek. Whether or not anyone will survive this latest Design is a mystery… sort of.

THE VERDICT

Technically I think all three films are strong, well assembled pictures that clearly boast refined cinematography, sound direction, and precise, adequate script writing. James Wong did an impressive job directing the first and third franchise films, and David R. Ellis did more than hold his own while helming the first initial sequel. While each cast is built upon an overdose of teen friendly faces, the gore and sadistic nature of the violence is anything but teen friendly. The contrast makes for a unique vibe that few genre pieces manage to offer. The fact that that rare sensation has already been duplicated (with fair success) twice, only helps solidify FINAL DESTINATION’s place in horror history.
With the positive comes the negative, and like most (if not all) horror franchises, there’s only so far this story can go before it becomes little more than a special effects showcase, and launching pad for Hollywood’s fresh new faces. But really, does that mean we should discard all sequels beyond a direct follow up or two? No, I don’t personally think so. I believe franchise fans will always follow their favorites, whether it be the FINAL DESTINATIONs, or HALLOWEENs of the world isn’t relevant. What is, is the fact that we’ll always crave a new approach to an old tale, especially when that old tale holds a special place in our hearts.

THE FUTURE

In a matter of days THE FINAL DESTINATION, (the fourth film of the franchise, which will be featured in both 2-d and 3-d) will be unleashed in theatres and left to duke it out at the box office with Rob Zombie’s highly anticipated HALLOWEEN II. Who will emerge the financial superior remains to be seen, but fair earnings for both pictures could well lead to even more sequels. The best case scenario for genre fans is success for both pictures, whether future installments follow or not. Regardless of how many millions each respective flick draws, and what the future brings in direct relation to the embrace of each picture - in the end, it’s the fans who win when both films hit theaters this Friday!

THE FINAL DESTINATION.

Nine years ago Jeffrey Reddick, Glen Morgan and James Wong (who all three contributed to writing tasks while Wong also handled direction) put their heads together to create a compelling tale of premonition, death, and ultimately the marriage of both. Reddick’s story centers around a French class, and the resident neurotic Alex (Devon Sawa) Browning who experiences an extremely vivid vision while boarding Flight 180, which is headed for Paris, France. Alex’s vision includes loose knobs, a shaky takeoff, and one hell of an explosion, which occurs just moments after beginning ascension. Naturally Alex is a bit freaked out by what seems to be life’s cruel case of foreshadowing, leading to an outburst on the plane which results in the evacuation of seven (including Alex) passengers.
Not five minutes pass and Flight 180 erupts in an explosion of fire and debris. Stunned, those who were forced from the plane turn their confusion and anger toward Alex, unaware of how he could possibly have known the disastrous fate of Flight 180. To Alex’s credit, he’s just as confused as everyone else, but neither his classmates, nor officials are apt to believe that Mr. Browning is some form of clairvoyant, or sudden psychic. But Alex has been cursed by some form of premonitory ability, and the tragedy that was Flight 180 was only the beginning. One by one, in a strange, but particular order - those who managed to escape death’s grasp on Flight 180 are being killed. With logic and the law both opposed to Alex and his claims, the teenager must solve a riddle proposed by Death Himself before his own card is finally pulled.
Three years later, Kimberly (A.J. Cook) Corman finds herself afflicted by the same psychic traits Alex battled three years prior, but she’s initially unaware of any connections whatsoever. Until that is, she sees a horrendous pileup on the freeway that claims handfuls of lives…just minutes before it actually happens. Kimberly’s expeditious panic saves quite a few lives, but she’ll soon discover that death cannot be swayed, and when it’s time to go, there is no saving lives. Before Ms. Corman can decipher the situation at hand however, she and those who escaped the accident all come to realize that they are in fact directly connected in some way or another to the Flight 180 victims. It is at this point that the group understands the severity of their predicament. But once again, Death has chosen it’s course, and though briefly swayed - He’s back on the trail of those who seek to sneak beyond the Reapers grip.
Fast-forward three more years and Death’s Design is once again in full effect. This time around, a group of teens who avoid a rollercoaster disaster thanks to Wendy (Mary Elizabeth Winstead) Christensen’s frighteningly accurate prediction of mechanical malfunction, are stalked and eliminated by life’s unseen nemesis. The clues are revealed in foreign fashion when compared to the pictures two predecessors, but the story is cohesive, despite a lack of sincere linking between these characters and the characters of the first two franchise installments. This time around Wendy and fellow survivor Kevin (Ryan Merriman) are forced to determine the means in which each victim will die, by discreet visual indicators located in pictures Wendy took the night of the accident. It’s a long journey to the end of the road, and Death has set out to see it‘s no comfortable trek. Whether or not anyone will survive this latest Design is a mystery… sort of.

THE VERDICT

Technically I think all three films are strong, well assembled pictures that clearly boast refined cinematography, sound direction, and precise, adequate script writing. James Wong did an impressive job directing the first and third franchise films, and David R. Ellis did more than hold his own while helming the first initial sequel. While each cast is built upon an overdose of teen friendly faces, the gore and sadistic nature of the violence is anything but teen friendly. The contrast makes for a unique vibe that few genre pieces manage to offer. The fact that that rare sensation has already been duplicated (with fair success) twice, only helps solidify FINAL DESTINATION’s place in horror history.
With the positive comes the negative, and like most (if not all) horror franchises, there’s only so far this story can go before it becomes little more than a special effects showcase, and launching pad for Hollywood’s fresh new faces. But really, does that mean we should discard all sequels beyond a direct follow up or two? No, I don’t personally think so. I believe franchise fans will always follow their favorites, whether it be the FINAL DESTINATIONs, or HALLOWEENs of the world isn’t relevant. What is, is the fact that we’ll always crave a new approach to an old tale, especially when that old tale holds a special place in our hearts.

THE FUTURE

In a matter of days THE FINAL DESTINATION, (the fourth film of the franchise, which will be featured in both 2-d and 3-d) will be unleashed in theatres and left to duke it out at the box office with Rob Zombie’s highly anticipated HALLOWEEN II. Who will emerge the financial superior remains to be seen, but fair earnings for both pictures could well lead to even more sequels. The best case scenario for genre fans is success for both pictures, whether future installments follow or not. Regardless of how many millions each respective flick draws, and what the future brings in direct relation to the embrace of each picture - in the end, it’s the fans who win when both films hit theaters this Friday!

THE FINAL DESTINATION.

Nine years ago Jeffrey Reddick, Glen Morgan and James Wong (who all three contributed to writing tasks while Wong also handled direction) put their heads together to create a compelling tale of premonition, death, and ultimately the marriage of both. Reddick’s story centers around a French class, and the resident neurotic Alex (Devon Sawa) Browning who experiences an extremely vivid vision while boarding Flight 180, which is headed for Paris, France. Alex’s vision includes loose knobs, a shaky takeoff, and one hell of an explosion, which occurs just moments after beginning ascension. Naturally Alex is a bit freaked out by what seems to be life’s cruel case of foreshadowing, leading to an outburst on the plane which results in the evacuation of seven (including Alex) passengers.
Not five minutes pass and Flight 180 erupts in an explosion of fire and debris. Stunned, those who were forced from the plane turn their confusion and anger toward Alex, unaware of how he could possibly have known the disastrous fate of Flight 180. To Alex’s credit, he’s just as confused as everyone else, but neither his classmates, nor officials are apt to believe that Mr. Browning is some form of clairvoyant, or sudden psychic. But Alex has been cursed by some form of premonitory ability, and the tragedy that was Flight 180 was only the beginning. One by one, in a strange, but particular order - those who managed to escape death’s grasp on Flight 180 are being killed. With logic and the law both opposed to Alex and his claims, the teenager must solve a riddle proposed by Death Himself before his own card is finally pulled.
Three years later, Kimberly (A.J. Cook) Corman finds herself afflicted by the same psychic traits Alex battled three years prior, but she’s initially unaware of any connections whatsoever. Until that is, she sees a horrendous pileup on the freeway that claims handfuls of lives…just minutes before it actually happens. Kimberly’s expeditious panic saves quite a few lives, but she’ll soon discover that death cannot be swayed, and when it’s time to go, there is no saving lives. Before Ms. Corman can decipher the situation at hand however, she and those who escaped the accident all come to realize that they are in fact directly connected in some way or another to the Flight 180 victims. It is at this point that the group understands the severity of their predicament. But once again, Death has chosen it’s course, and though briefly swayed - He’s back on the trail of those who seek to sneak beyond the Reapers grip.
Fast-forward three more years and Death’s Design is once again in full effect. This time around, a group of teens who avoid a rollercoaster disaster thanks to Wendy (Mary Elizabeth Winstead) Christensen’s frighteningly accurate prediction of mechanical malfunction, are stalked and eliminated by life’s unseen nemesis. The clues are revealed in foreign fashion when compared to the pictures two predecessors, but the story is cohesive, despite a lack of sincere linking between these characters and the characters of the first two franchise installments. This time around Wendy and fellow survivor Kevin (Ryan Merriman) are forced to determine the means in which each victim will die, by discreet visual indicators located in pictures Wendy took the night of the accident. It’s a long journey to the end of the road, and Death has set out to see it‘s no comfortable trek. Whether or not anyone will survive this latest Design is a mystery… sort of.

THE VERDICT

Technically I think all three films are strong, well assembled pictures that clearly boast refined cinematography, sound direction, and precise, adequate script writing. James Wong did an impressive job directing the first and third franchise films, and David R. Ellis did more than hold his own while helming the first initial sequel. While each cast is built upon an overdose of teen friendly faces, the gore and sadistic nature of the violence is anything but teen friendly. The contrast makes for a unique vibe that few genre pieces manage to offer. The fact that that rare sensation has already been duplicated (with fair success) twice, only helps solidify FINAL DESTINATION’s place in horror history.
With the positive comes the negative, and like most (if not all) horror franchises, there’s only so far this story can go before it becomes little more than a special effects showcase, and launching pad for Hollywood’s fresh new faces. But really, does that mean we should discard all sequels beyond a direct follow up or two? No, I don’t personally think so. I believe franchise fans will always follow their favorites, whether it be the FINAL DESTINATIONs, or HALLOWEENs of the world isn’t relevant. What is, is the fact that we’ll always crave a new approach to an old tale, especially when that old tale holds a special place in our hearts.

THE FUTURE

In a matter of days THE FINAL DESTINATION, (the fourth film of the franchise, which will be featured in both 2-d and 3-d) will be unleashed in theatres and left to duke it out at the box office with Rob Zombie’s highly anticipated HALLOWEEN II. Who will emerge the financial superior remains to be seen, but fair earnings for both pictures could well lead to even more sequels. The best case scenario for genre fans is success for both pictures, whether future installments follow or not. Regardless of how many millions each respective flick draws, and what the future brings in direct relation to the embrace of each picture - in the end, it’s the fans who win when both films hit theaters this Friday!

THE FINAL DESTINATION.

Nine years ago Jeffrey Reddick, Glen Morgan and James Wong (who all three contributed to writing tasks while Wong also handled direction) put their heads together to create a compelling tale of premonition, death, and ultimately the marriage of both. Reddick’s story centers around a French class, and the resident neurotic Alex (Devon Sawa) Browning who experiences an extremely vivid vision while boarding Flight 180, which is headed for Paris, France. Alex’s vision includes loose knobs, a shaky takeoff, and one hell of an explosion, which occurs just moments after beginning ascension. Naturally Alex is a bit freaked out by what seems to be life’s cruel case of foreshadowing, leading to an outburst on the plane which results in the evacuation of seven (including Alex) passengers.
Not five minutes pass and Flight 180 erupts in an explosion of fire and debris. Stunned, those who were forced from the plane turn their confusion and anger toward Alex, unaware of how he could possibly have known the disastrous fate of Flight 180. To Alex’s credit, he’s just as confused as everyone else, but neither his classmates, nor officials are apt to believe that Mr. Browning is some form of clairvoyant, or sudden psychic. But Alex has been cursed by some form of premonitory ability, and the tragedy that was Flight 180 was only the beginning. One by one, in a strange, but particular order - those who managed to escape death’s grasp on Flight 180 are being killed. With logic and the law both opposed to Alex and his claims, the teenager must solve a riddle proposed by Death Himself before his own card is finally pulled.
Three years later, Kimberly (A.J. Cook) Corman finds herself afflicted by the same psychic traits Alex battled three years prior, but she’s initially unaware of any connections whatsoever. Until that is, she sees a horrendous pileup on the freeway that claims handfuls of lives…just minutes before it actually happens. Kimberly’s expeditious panic saves quite a few lives, but she’ll soon discover that death cannot be swayed, and when it’s time to go, there is no saving lives. Before Ms. Corman can decipher the situation at hand however, she and those who escaped the accident all come to realize that they are in fact directly connected in some way or another to the Flight 180 victims. It is at this point that the group understands the severity of their predicament. But once again, Death has chosen it’s course, and though briefly swayed - He’s back on the trail of those who seek to sneak beyond the Reapers grip.
Fast-forward three more years and Death’s Design is once again in full effect. This time around, a group of teens who avoid a rollercoaster disaster thanks to Wendy (Mary Elizabeth Winstead) Christensen’s frighteningly accurate prediction of mechanical malfunction, are stalked and eliminated by life’s unseen nemesis. The clues are revealed in foreign fashion when compared to the pictures two predecessors, but the story is cohesive, despite a lack of sincere linking between these characters and the characters of the first two franchise installments. This time around Wendy and fellow survivor Kevin (Ryan Merriman) are forced to determine the means in which each victim will die, by discreet visual indicators located in pictures Wendy took the night of the accident. It’s a long journey to the end of the road, and Death has set out to see it‘s no comfortable trek. Whether or not anyone will survive this latest Design is a mystery… sort of.

THE VERDICT

Technically I think all three films are strong, well assembled pictures that clearly boast refined cinematography, sound direction, and precise, adequate script writing. James Wong did an impressive job directing the first and third franchise films, and David R. Ellis did more than hold his own while helming the first initial sequel. While each cast is built upon an overdose of teen friendly faces, the gore and sadistic nature of the violence is anything but teen friendly. The contrast makes for a unique vibe that few genre pieces manage to offer. The fact that that rare sensation has already been duplicated (with fair success) twice, only helps solidify FINAL DESTINATION’s place in horror history.
With the positive comes the negative, and like most (if not all) horror franchises, there’s only so far this story can go before it becomes little more than a special effects showcase, and launching pad for Hollywood’s fresh new faces. But really, does that mean we should discard all sequels beyond a direct follow up or two? No, I don’t personally think so. I believe franchise fans will always follow their favorites, whether it be the FINAL DESTINATIONs, or HALLOWEENs of the world isn’t relevant. What is, is the fact that we’ll always crave a new approach to an old tale, especially when that old tale holds a special place in our hearts.

THE FUTURE

In a matter of days THE FINAL DESTINATION, (the fourth film of the franchise, which will be featured in both 2-d and 3-d) will be unleashed in theatres and left to duke it out at the box office with Rob Zombie’s highly anticipated HALLOWEEN II. Who will emerge the financial superior remains to be seen, but fair earnings for both pictures could well lead to even more sequels. The best case scenario for genre fans is success for both pictures, whether future installments follow or not. Regardless of how many millions each respective flick draws, and what the future brings in direct relation to the embrace of each picture - in the end, it’s the fans who win when both films hit theaters this Friday!

Bollywood icon SRK detained in US, send fans Into a Tizzy (Intro Roundup)

NEW YORK/NEW DELHI - Bollywood icon Shah Rukh Khan was detained and questioned by immigration officials at a US airport for more than two hours on arrival to take part in a function to mark India’s Independence Day, sending his fans into a tizzy.
But hours after being detained at the Newark Liberty Airport in New Jersey Friday, Khan participated at an event advertised as a “Dinner with Shah Rukh Khan” at
the Trump Taj Mahal Casino.
Though he jokingly referred to the incident during his performance, SRK spoke out strongly against his treatment at the airport after the event, saying “it was not a good feeling” when the security officials took him to a separate room for questioning.
I appreciated my independence a million times more today, I wish I was in India on Independence Day,” said Khan who was on way to Chicago to take part in an Independence Day event.
In New Delhi, External Affairs Ministry Spokesman Vishnu Prakash said India had taken up the issue with the US embassy.
The matter was taken up with the US embassy,” Prakash said.
In a statement, US Ambassador to India Timothy J. Roemer said: “We are trying to ascertain the facts of the case - to understand what took place.”
Shah Rukh was a “global icon” and “he is a very welcome guest in the United States. Many Americans love his films,” the envoy added.
The Indian consulate in New York said by the time they were informed about the incident and contacted the superstar, Khan said the incident was already over.
I was taken to a room for questioning. They said my name kept popping up on the computer,” Khan was quoted as saying. Immigration officers wanted to know why Khan was visiting the US. after his name appeared on a computer screen at a counter.
Khan is a Muslim name, and I think the name is common on their checklist,” the actor said. “I was waiting for my bags. I thought it was nice of them to take me to another room, but that was apparently a second check. I had my papers in order.”
I was really hassled at the airport because of my name being Khan…The couple of hours of interrogation wanting to know if I know anyone in America while all around people were vouching for me from India and Pakistan (sic),” the Bollywood superstar said in a statement.
Only these guys just would not let me through. Finally they allowed me to make a call, which I did and the Indian Consulate helped me through.”
It was absolutely uncalled for I think, me having just finished working there for more than a month…just a couple of weeks ago. They said I have a common name which is causing the delay…checked my bags…I felt angry and humiliated,” Khan said.
He said after about an hour, he asked the officials if he could make a call. “They said it was not allowed from here but they could make an exception. I called a friend who contacted an Indian embassy official who came and vouched for me,” Khan said.
I am assuming this country is paranoid with a certain section of religion in the world. This has happened to me before. This is not the first time.”
Khan’s latest film “My Name is Khan” produced by Khan and director Karan Johar is set against the September 11, 2001 terror attacks and examines their impact on an Indian Muslim living in the US.
The film, shot largely in the US, is near completion and US-based Fox Star Studios has secured the global distribution rights for a deal which industry insiders estimate to be about 20 million dollars.

Bollywood icon SRK detained in US, send fans Into a Tizzy (Intro Roundup)

NEW YORK/NEW DELHI - Bollywood icon Shah Rukh Khan was detained and questioned by immigration officials at a US airport for more than two hours on arrival to take part in a function to mark India’s Independence Day, sending his fans into a tizzy.
But hours after being detained at the Newark Liberty Airport in New Jersey Friday, Khan participated at an event advertised as a “Dinner with Shah Rukh Khan” at
the Trump Taj Mahal Casino.
Though he jokingly referred to the incident during his performance, SRK spoke out strongly against his treatment at the airport after the event, saying “it was not a good feeling” when the security officials took him to a separate room for questioning.
I appreciated my independence a million times more today, I wish I was in India on Independence Day,” said Khan who was on way to Chicago to take part in an Independence Day event.
In New Delhi, External Affairs Ministry Spokesman Vishnu Prakash said India had taken up the issue with the US embassy.
The matter was taken up with the US embassy,” Prakash said.
In a statement, US Ambassador to India Timothy J. Roemer said: “We are trying to ascertain the facts of the case - to understand what took place.”
Shah Rukh was a “global icon” and “he is a very welcome guest in the United States. Many Americans love his films,” the envoy added.
The Indian consulate in New York said by the time they were informed about the incident and contacted the superstar, Khan said the incident was already over.
I was taken to a room for questioning. They said my name kept popping up on the computer,” Khan was quoted as saying. Immigration officers wanted to know why Khan was visiting the US. after his name appeared on a computer screen at a counter.
Khan is a Muslim name, and I think the name is common on their checklist,” the actor said. “I was waiting for my bags. I thought it was nice of them to take me to another room, but that was apparently a second check. I had my papers in order.”
I was really hassled at the airport because of my name being Khan…The couple of hours of interrogation wanting to know if I know anyone in America while all around people were vouching for me from India and Pakistan (sic),” the Bollywood superstar said in a statement.
Only these guys just would not let me through. Finally they allowed me to make a call, which I did and the Indian Consulate helped me through.”
It was absolutely uncalled for I think, me having just finished working there for more than a month…just a couple of weeks ago. They said I have a common name which is causing the delay…checked my bags…I felt angry and humiliated,” Khan said.
He said after about an hour, he asked the officials if he could make a call. “They said it was not allowed from here but they could make an exception. I called a friend who contacted an Indian embassy official who came and vouched for me,” Khan said.
I am assuming this country is paranoid with a certain section of religion in the world. This has happened to me before. This is not the first time.”
Khan’s latest film “My Name is Khan” produced by Khan and director Karan Johar is set against the September 11, 2001 terror attacks and examines their impact on an Indian Muslim living in the US.
The film, shot largely in the US, is near completion and US-based Fox Star Studios has secured the global distribution rights for a deal which industry insiders estimate to be about 20 million dollars.

Bollywood icon SRK detained in US, send fans Into a Tizzy (Intro Roundup)

NEW YORK/NEW DELHI - Bollywood icon Shah Rukh Khan was detained and questioned by immigration officials at a US airport for more than two hours on arrival to take part in a function to mark India’s Independence Day, sending his fans into a tizzy.
But hours after being detained at the Newark Liberty Airport in New Jersey Friday, Khan participated at an event advertised as a “Dinner with Shah Rukh Khan” at
the Trump Taj Mahal Casino.
Though he jokingly referred to the incident during his performance, SRK spoke out strongly against his treatment at the airport after the event, saying “it was not a good feeling” when the security officials took him to a separate room for questioning.
I appreciated my independence a million times more today, I wish I was in India on Independence Day,” said Khan who was on way to Chicago to take part in an Independence Day event.
In New Delhi, External Affairs Ministry Spokesman Vishnu Prakash said India had taken up the issue with the US embassy.
The matter was taken up with the US embassy,” Prakash said.
In a statement, US Ambassador to India Timothy J. Roemer said: “We are trying to ascertain the facts of the case - to understand what took place.”
Shah Rukh was a “global icon” and “he is a very welcome guest in the United States. Many Americans love his films,” the envoy added.
The Indian consulate in New York said by the time they were informed about the incident and contacted the superstar, Khan said the incident was already over.
I was taken to a room for questioning. They said my name kept popping up on the computer,” Khan was quoted as saying. Immigration officers wanted to know why Khan was visiting the US. after his name appeared on a computer screen at a counter.
Khan is a Muslim name, and I think the name is common on their checklist,” the actor said. “I was waiting for my bags. I thought it was nice of them to take me to another room, but that was apparently a second check. I had my papers in order.”
I was really hassled at the airport because of my name being Khan…The couple of hours of interrogation wanting to know if I know anyone in America while all around people were vouching for me from India and Pakistan (sic),” the Bollywood superstar said in a statement.
Only these guys just would not let me through. Finally they allowed me to make a call, which I did and the Indian Consulate helped me through.”
It was absolutely uncalled for I think, me having just finished working there for more than a month…just a couple of weeks ago. They said I have a common name which is causing the delay…checked my bags…I felt angry and humiliated,” Khan said.
He said after about an hour, he asked the officials if he could make a call. “They said it was not allowed from here but they could make an exception. I called a friend who contacted an Indian embassy official who came and vouched for me,” Khan said.
I am assuming this country is paranoid with a certain section of religion in the world. This has happened to me before. This is not the first time.”
Khan’s latest film “My Name is Khan” produced by Khan and director Karan Johar is set against the September 11, 2001 terror attacks and examines their impact on an Indian Muslim living in the US.
The film, shot largely in the US, is near completion and US-based Fox Star Studios has secured the global distribution rights for a deal which industry insiders estimate to be about 20 million dollars.

Bollywood icon SRK detained in US, send fans Into a Tizzy (Intro Roundup)

NEW YORK/NEW DELHI - Bollywood icon Shah Rukh Khan was detained and questioned by immigration officials at a US airport for more than two hours on arrival to take part in a function to mark India’s Independence Day, sending his fans into a tizzy.
But hours after being detained at the Newark Liberty Airport in New Jersey Friday, Khan participated at an event advertised as a “Dinner with Shah Rukh Khan” at
the Trump Taj Mahal Casino.
Though he jokingly referred to the incident during his performance, SRK spoke out strongly against his treatment at the airport after the event, saying “it was not a good feeling” when the security officials took him to a separate room for questioning.
I appreciated my independence a million times more today, I wish I was in India on Independence Day,” said Khan who was on way to Chicago to take part in an Independence Day event.
In New Delhi, External Affairs Ministry Spokesman Vishnu Prakash said India had taken up the issue with the US embassy.
The matter was taken up with the US embassy,” Prakash said.
In a statement, US Ambassador to India Timothy J. Roemer said: “We are trying to ascertain the facts of the case - to understand what took place.”
Shah Rukh was a “global icon” and “he is a very welcome guest in the United States. Many Americans love his films,” the envoy added.
The Indian consulate in New York said by the time they were informed about the incident and contacted the superstar, Khan said the incident was already over.
I was taken to a room for questioning. They said my name kept popping up on the computer,” Khan was quoted as saying. Immigration officers wanted to know why Khan was visiting the US. after his name appeared on a computer screen at a counter.
Khan is a Muslim name, and I think the name is common on their checklist,” the actor said. “I was waiting for my bags. I thought it was nice of them to take me to another room, but that was apparently a second check. I had my papers in order.”
I was really hassled at the airport because of my name being Khan…The couple of hours of interrogation wanting to know if I know anyone in America while all around people were vouching for me from India and Pakistan (sic),” the Bollywood superstar said in a statement.
Only these guys just would not let me through. Finally they allowed me to make a call, which I did and the Indian Consulate helped me through.”
It was absolutely uncalled for I think, me having just finished working there for more than a month…just a couple of weeks ago. They said I have a common name which is causing the delay…checked my bags…I felt angry and humiliated,” Khan said.
He said after about an hour, he asked the officials if he could make a call. “They said it was not allowed from here but they could make an exception. I called a friend who contacted an Indian embassy official who came and vouched for me,” Khan said.
I am assuming this country is paranoid with a certain section of religion in the world. This has happened to me before. This is not the first time.”
Khan’s latest film “My Name is Khan” produced by Khan and director Karan Johar is set against the September 11, 2001 terror attacks and examines their impact on an Indian Muslim living in the US.
The film, shot largely in the US, is near completion and US-based Fox Star Studios has secured the global distribution rights for a deal which industry insiders estimate to be about 20 million dollars.

Bollywood icon SRK detained in US, send fans Into a Tizzy (Intro Roundup)

NEW YORK/NEW DELHI - Bollywood icon Shah Rukh Khan was detained and questioned by immigration officials at a US airport for more than two hours on arrival to take part in a function to mark India’s Independence Day, sending his fans into a tizzy.
But hours after being detained at the Newark Liberty Airport in New Jersey Friday, Khan participated at an event advertised as a “Dinner with Shah Rukh Khan” at
the Trump Taj Mahal Casino.
Though he jokingly referred to the incident during his performance, SRK spoke out strongly against his treatment at the airport after the event, saying “it was not a good feeling” when the security officials took him to a separate room for questioning.
I appreciated my independence a million times more today, I wish I was in India on Independence Day,” said Khan who was on way to Chicago to take part in an Independence Day event.
In New Delhi, External Affairs Ministry Spokesman Vishnu Prakash said India had taken up the issue with the US embassy.
The matter was taken up with the US embassy,” Prakash said.
In a statement, US Ambassador to India Timothy J. Roemer said: “We are trying to ascertain the facts of the case - to understand what took place.”
Shah Rukh was a “global icon” and “he is a very welcome guest in the United States. Many Americans love his films,” the envoy added.
The Indian consulate in New York said by the time they were informed about the incident and contacted the superstar, Khan said the incident was already over.
I was taken to a room for questioning. They said my name kept popping up on the computer,” Khan was quoted as saying. Immigration officers wanted to know why Khan was visiting the US. after his name appeared on a computer screen at a counter.
Khan is a Muslim name, and I think the name is common on their checklist,” the actor said. “I was waiting for my bags. I thought it was nice of them to take me to another room, but that was apparently a second check. I had my papers in order.”
I was really hassled at the airport because of my name being Khan…The couple of hours of interrogation wanting to know if I know anyone in America while all around people were vouching for me from India and Pakistan (sic),” the Bollywood superstar said in a statement.
Only these guys just would not let me through. Finally they allowed me to make a call, which I did and the Indian Consulate helped me through.”
It was absolutely uncalled for I think, me having just finished working there for more than a month…just a couple of weeks ago. They said I have a common name which is causing the delay…checked my bags…I felt angry and humiliated,” Khan said.
He said after about an hour, he asked the officials if he could make a call. “They said it was not allowed from here but they could make an exception. I called a friend who contacted an Indian embassy official who came and vouched for me,” Khan said.
I am assuming this country is paranoid with a certain section of religion in the world. This has happened to me before. This is not the first time.”
Khan’s latest film “My Name is Khan” produced by Khan and director Karan Johar is set against the September 11, 2001 terror attacks and examines their impact on an Indian Muslim living in the US.
The film, shot largely in the US, is near completion and US-based Fox Star Studios has secured the global distribution rights for a deal which industry insiders estimate to be about 20 million dollars.

Bollywood icon SRK detained in US, send fans Into a Tizzy (Intro Roundup)

NEW YORK/NEW DELHI - Bollywood icon Shah Rukh Khan was detained and questioned by immigration officials at a US airport for more than two hours on arrival to take part in a function to mark India’s Independence Day, sending his fans into a tizzy.
But hours after being detained at the Newark Liberty Airport in New Jersey Friday, Khan participated at an event advertised as a “Dinner with Shah Rukh Khan” at
the Trump Taj Mahal Casino.
Though he jokingly referred to the incident during his performance, SRK spoke out strongly against his treatment at the airport after the event, saying “it was not a good feeling” when the security officials took him to a separate room for questioning.
I appreciated my independence a million times more today, I wish I was in India on Independence Day,” said Khan who was on way to Chicago to take part in an Independence Day event.
In New Delhi, External Affairs Ministry Spokesman Vishnu Prakash said India had taken up the issue with the US embassy.
The matter was taken up with the US embassy,” Prakash said.
In a statement, US Ambassador to India Timothy J. Roemer said: “We are trying to ascertain the facts of the case - to understand what took place.”
Shah Rukh was a “global icon” and “he is a very welcome guest in the United States. Many Americans love his films,” the envoy added.
The Indian consulate in New York said by the time they were informed about the incident and contacted the superstar, Khan said the incident was already over.
I was taken to a room for questioning. They said my name kept popping up on the computer,” Khan was quoted as saying. Immigration officers wanted to know why Khan was visiting the US. after his name appeared on a computer screen at a counter.
Khan is a Muslim name, and I think the name is common on their checklist,” the actor said. “I was waiting for my bags. I thought it was nice of them to take me to another room, but that was apparently a second check. I had my papers in order.”
I was really hassled at the airport because of my name being Khan…The couple of hours of interrogation wanting to know if I know anyone in America while all around people were vouching for me from India and Pakistan (sic),” the Bollywood superstar said in a statement.
Only these guys just would not let me through. Finally they allowed me to make a call, which I did and the Indian Consulate helped me through.”
It was absolutely uncalled for I think, me having just finished working there for more than a month…just a couple of weeks ago. They said I have a common name which is causing the delay…checked my bags…I felt angry and humiliated,” Khan said.
He said after about an hour, he asked the officials if he could make a call. “They said it was not allowed from here but they could make an exception. I called a friend who contacted an Indian embassy official who came and vouched for me,” Khan said.
I am assuming this country is paranoid with a certain section of religion in the world. This has happened to me before. This is not the first time.”
Khan’s latest film “My Name is Khan” produced by Khan and director Karan Johar is set against the September 11, 2001 terror attacks and examines their impact on an Indian Muslim living in the US.
The film, shot largely in the US, is near completion and US-based Fox Star Studios has secured the global distribution rights for a deal which industry insiders estimate to be about 20 million dollars.

Bollywood Muslim Actor Shahrukh Khan Detained by US immigration

Shahrukh Khan, one of the best known faces in India, was detained at a US airport for questioning on Saturday as he traveled to Chicago to celebrate India’s Independence day.
The famous actor, named as one of the 50 most influential men in the world in 2008 by US magazine Newsweek, was detained by US immigration officers at Newark Airport in Newark, New Jersey.
According to Khan he was questioned for two hours but was released after the Indian embassy in the United States intervened.
Khan is a Muslim name and I think the name is common on their checklist”, the 43-year-old actor told an Indian television station by telephone from Chicago.
Known as the “King of Bollywood”, Khan said he was waiting for his bags when immigration officers approached him.
I thought it was nice of them to take me to another room… but that was apparently a second check. I was really taken aback [but] I had my papers in order,” he said.
Khan, whose latest film My Name is Khan has been shot in the US said, “they wanted to know why I came to the US and where I am staying”.
Khan said: “Certain countries have issues with my name. I am very proud of my name”.
In New Delhi, External Affairs Ministry spokesperson Vishnu Prakash said India has taken up the issue with the US embassy and the consul general of India in New York is in touch with Shah Rukh.
US Ambassador to India, Timothy J. Roemer, said: “We are trying to ascertain the facts of the case - to understand what took place. He is a very welcome guest in the United States. Many Americans love his films.”

Bollywood Muslim Actor Shahrukh Khan Detained by US immigration

Shahrukh Khan, one of the best known faces in India, was detained at a US airport for questioning on Saturday as he traveled to Chicago to celebrate India’s Independence day.
The famous actor, named as one of the 50 most influential men in the world in 2008 by US magazine Newsweek, was detained by US immigration officers at Newark Airport in Newark, New Jersey.
According to Khan he was questioned for two hours but was released after the Indian embassy in the United States intervened.
Khan is a Muslim name and I think the name is common on their checklist”, the 43-year-old actor told an Indian television station by telephone from Chicago.
Known as the “King of Bollywood”, Khan said he was waiting for his bags when immigration officers approached him.
I thought it was nice of them to take me to another room… but that was apparently a second check. I was really taken aback [but] I had my papers in order,” he said.
Khan, whose latest film My Name is Khan has been shot in the US said, “they wanted to know why I came to the US and where I am staying”.
Khan said: “Certain countries have issues with my name. I am very proud of my name”.
In New Delhi, External Affairs Ministry spokesperson Vishnu Prakash said India has taken up the issue with the US embassy and the consul general of India in New York is in touch with Shah Rukh.
US Ambassador to India, Timothy J. Roemer, said: “We are trying to ascertain the facts of the case - to understand what took place. He is a very welcome guest in the United States. Many Americans love his films.”

Bollywood Muslim Actor Shahrukh Khan Detained by US immigration

Shahrukh Khan, one of the best known faces in India, was detained at a US airport for questioning on Saturday as he traveled to Chicago to celebrate India’s Independence day.
The famous actor, named as one of the 50 most influential men in the world in 2008 by US magazine Newsweek, was detained by US immigration officers at Newark Airport in Newark, New Jersey.
According to Khan he was questioned for two hours but was released after the Indian embassy in the United States intervened.
Khan is a Muslim name and I think the name is common on their checklist”, the 43-year-old actor told an Indian television station by telephone from Chicago.
Known as the “King of Bollywood”, Khan said he was waiting for his bags when immigration officers approached him.
I thought it was nice of them to take me to another room… but that was apparently a second check. I was really taken aback [but] I had my papers in order,” he said.
Khan, whose latest film My Name is Khan has been shot in the US said, “they wanted to know why I came to the US and where I am staying”.
Khan said: “Certain countries have issues with my name. I am very proud of my name”.
In New Delhi, External Affairs Ministry spokesperson Vishnu Prakash said India has taken up the issue with the US embassy and the consul general of India in New York is in touch with Shah Rukh.
US Ambassador to India, Timothy J. Roemer, said: “We are trying to ascertain the facts of the case - to understand what took place. He is a very welcome guest in the United States. Many Americans love his films.”

Bollywood Muslim Actor Shahrukh Khan Detained by US immigration

Shahrukh Khan, one of the best known faces in India, was detained at a US airport for questioning on Saturday as he traveled to Chicago to celebrate India’s Independence day.
The famous actor, named as one of the 50 most influential men in the world in 2008 by US magazine Newsweek, was detained by US immigration officers at Newark Airport in Newark, New Jersey.
According to Khan he was questioned for two hours but was released after the Indian embassy in the United States intervened.
Khan is a Muslim name and I think the name is common on their checklist”, the 43-year-old actor told an Indian television station by telephone from Chicago.
Known as the “King of Bollywood”, Khan said he was waiting for his bags when immigration officers approached him.
I thought it was nice of them to take me to another room… but that was apparently a second check. I was really taken aback [but] I had my papers in order,” he said.
Khan, whose latest film My Name is Khan has been shot in the US said, “they wanted to know why I came to the US and where I am staying”.
Khan said: “Certain countries have issues with my name. I am very proud of my name”.
In New Delhi, External Affairs Ministry spokesperson Vishnu Prakash said India has taken up the issue with the US embassy and the consul general of India in New York is in touch with Shah Rukh.
US Ambassador to India, Timothy J. Roemer, said: “We are trying to ascertain the facts of the case - to understand what took place. He is a very welcome guest in the United States. Many Americans love his films.”

Bollywood Muslim Actor Shahrukh Khan Detained by US immigration

Shahrukh Khan, one of the best known faces in India, was detained at a US airport for questioning on Saturday as he traveled to Chicago to celebrate India’s Independence day.
The famous actor, named as one of the 50 most influential men in the world in 2008 by US magazine Newsweek, was detained by US immigration officers at Newark Airport in Newark, New Jersey.
According to Khan he was questioned for two hours but was released after the Indian embassy in the United States intervened.
Khan is a Muslim name and I think the name is common on their checklist”, the 43-year-old actor told an Indian television station by telephone from Chicago.
Known as the “King of Bollywood”, Khan said he was waiting for his bags when immigration officers approached him.
I thought it was nice of them to take me to another room… but that was apparently a second check. I was really taken aback [but] I had my papers in order,” he said.
Khan, whose latest film My Name is Khan has been shot in the US said, “they wanted to know why I came to the US and where I am staying”.
Khan said: “Certain countries have issues with my name. I am very proud of my name”.
In New Delhi, External Affairs Ministry spokesperson Vishnu Prakash said India has taken up the issue with the US embassy and the consul general of India in New York is in touch with Shah Rukh.
US Ambassador to India, Timothy J. Roemer, said: “We are trying to ascertain the facts of the case - to understand what took place. He is a very welcome guest in the United States. Many Americans love his films.”

Bollywood Muslim Actor Shahrukh Khan Detained by US immigration

Shahrukh Khan, one of the best known faces in India, was detained at a US airport for questioning on Saturday as he traveled to Chicago to celebrate India’s Independence day.
The famous actor, named as one of the 50 most influential men in the world in 2008 by US magazine Newsweek, was detained by US immigration officers at Newark Airport in Newark, New Jersey.
According to Khan he was questioned for two hours but was released after the Indian embassy in the United States intervened.
Khan is a Muslim name and I think the name is common on their checklist”, the 43-year-old actor told an Indian television station by telephone from Chicago.
Known as the “King of Bollywood”, Khan said he was waiting for his bags when immigration officers approached him.
I thought it was nice of them to take me to another room… but that was apparently a second check. I was really taken aback [but] I had my papers in order,” he said.
Khan, whose latest film My Name is Khan has been shot in the US said, “they wanted to know why I came to the US and where I am staying”.
Khan said: “Certain countries have issues with my name. I am very proud of my name”.
In New Delhi, External Affairs Ministry spokesperson Vishnu Prakash said India has taken up the issue with the US embassy and the consul general of India in New York is in touch with Shah Rukh.
US Ambassador to India, Timothy J. Roemer, said: “We are trying to ascertain the facts of the case - to understand what took place. He is a very welcome guest in the United States. Many Americans love his films.”

funy picc

funy picc

funy picc

funy picc

funy picc

funy picc

funy pic

funy pic

funy pic